<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Megapixel Definition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.use-ip.co.uk/megapixel-definition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.use-ip.co.uk/megapixel-definition/</link>
	<description>IP Cameras and IP CCTV News &#38; information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:15:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Stewkesbury</title>
		<link>http://blog.use-ip.co.uk/megapixel-definition/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Stewkesbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.use-ip.co.uk/?p=271#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

&quot;Cause it’s cheap?&quot;

Not in the long run.
Not according to Axis ROI studies.
Not if you&#039;re hoping to ID criminals and gain convictions (and thereby some worthwhile deterrent value!).
Not so much cheaper that it&#039;s worth limiting your future options (to co-ax and analogue CCTV).
Not if you already have an IP network but need to pay somebody to install co-ax.
Not if you have to pay registered electrical installers to provide the power supplies when you could have used POE.

But above all else - think about the image.
Delighted to chat with a UK installer today who has started a school CCTV system with three Avigilon 5MP col/mono cameras and Avigilon recording software on a dedicated PC. It sits alongside their old analogue CCTV system and they&#039;re blown away by the quality!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>&#8220;Cause it’s cheap?&#8221;</p>
<p>Not in the long run.<br />
Not according to Axis ROI studies.<br />
Not if you&#8217;re hoping to ID criminals and gain convictions (and thereby some worthwhile deterrent value!).<br />
Not so much cheaper that it&#8217;s worth limiting your future options (to co-ax and analogue CCTV).<br />
Not if you already have an IP network but need to pay somebody to install co-ax.<br />
Not if you have to pay registered electrical installers to provide the power supplies when you could have used POE.</p>
<p>But above all else &#8211; think about the image.<br />
Delighted to chat with a UK installer today who has started a school CCTV system with three Avigilon 5MP col/mono cameras and Avigilon recording software on a dedicated PC. It sits alongside their old analogue CCTV system and they&#8217;re blown away by the quality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.use-ip.co.uk/megapixel-definition/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.use-ip.co.uk/?p=271#comment-107</guid>
		<description>&quot;why would anybody install a security imaging solution based upon co-ax which is unlikely to ever exceed 1/20th of the performance of a mobile phone?&quot;

Cause it&#039;s cheap? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;why would anybody install a security imaging solution based upon co-ax which is unlikely to ever exceed 1/20th of the performance of a mobile phone?&#8221;</p>
<p>Cause it&#8217;s cheap? <img src='http://blog.use-ip.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

